On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:23:26AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 12/12/2012 08:57 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:13:03PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >> We have two issues in current code:
> >> - if target gfn is used as its page table, guest will refault then kvm
On 12/12/2012 08:57 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:13:03PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> We have two issues in current code:
>> - if target gfn is used as its page table, guest will refault then kvm will
>> use
>> small page size to map it. We need two #PF to fix its s
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:13:03PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> We have two issues in current code:
> - if target gfn is used as its page table, guest will refault then kvm will
> use
> small page size to map it. We need two #PF to fix its shadow page table
>
> - sometimes, say a exception is
We have two issues in current code:
- if target gfn is used as its page table, guest will refault then kvm will use
small page size to map it. We need two #PF to fix its shadow page table
- sometimes, say a exception is triggered during vm-exit caused by #PF
(see handle_exception() in vmx.c),
4 matches
Mail list logo