Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] of: reimplement the matching method for __of_match_node()

2014-02-18 Thread Kevin Hao
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:21:02PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote: > + /* > + * Matching compatible is better than matching type and name, > + * and the specific compatible is better than the general. > + */ > + if (matches->compatible[0] && >

[PATCH v2 2/4] of: reimplement the matching method for __of_match_node()

2014-02-18 Thread Kevin Hao
In the current implementation of __of_match_node(), it will compare each given match entry against all the node's compatible strings with of_device_is_compatible(). To achieve multiple compatible strings per node with ordering from specific to generic, this requires given matches to be ordered fro