Hi Lee,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 09:00:51AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >> Probably the reason for all of these non-kernel-isms is that this
> > >> isn't a kernel file. From the top of the file:
> >
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Lee,
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> Probably the reason for all of these non-kernel-isms is that this
> >> isn't a kernel file. From the top of the file:
> >>
> >> * NOTE: This file is copied verbatim from the ChromeOS EC
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 04:38:17PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Jun 2016, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > The EC_CMD_PWM_{GET,SET}_DUTY commands allow us to control a PWM that is
> > > attached to the EC, rather than the main host SoC. The API provide
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 04:38:17PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2016, Brian Norris wrote:
> > The EC_CMD_PWM_{GET,SET}_DUTY commands allow us to control a PWM that is
> > attached to the EC, rather than the main host SoC. The API provides
> > functionality-based (e.g., keyboard light, b
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:55:52PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:06:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
[...]
> > > > Please use kerneldoc format.
[...]
> > > Probably the
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:06:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 02 Jun 2016, Brian Norris wrote:
> > >
> > >> The EC_CMD_PWM_{GET,SET}_DUTY commands allow us to control a PWM that is
> > >> a
Lee,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> Probably the reason for all of these non-kernel-isms is that this
>> isn't a kernel file. From the top of the file:
>>
>> * NOTE: This file is copied verbatim from the ChromeOS EC Open Source
>> * project in an attempt to make future up
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Jun 2016, Brian Norris wrote:
> >
> >> The EC_CMD_PWM_{GET,SET}_DUTY commands allow us to control a PWM that is
> >> attached to the EC, rather than the main host SoC. The API provides
> >>
Lee,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2016, Brian Norris wrote:
>
>> The EC_CMD_PWM_{GET,SET}_DUTY commands allow us to control a PWM that is
>> attached to the EC, rather than the main host SoC. The API provides
>> functionality-based (e.g., keyboard light, back
On Thu, 02 Jun 2016, Brian Norris wrote:
> The EC_CMD_PWM_{GET,SET}_DUTY commands allow us to control a PWM that is
> attached to the EC, rather than the main host SoC. The API provides
> functionality-based (e.g., keyboard light, backlight) or index-based
> addressing of the PWM(s). Duty cycles a
The EC_CMD_PWM_{GET,SET}_DUTY commands allow us to control a PWM that is
attached to the EC, rather than the main host SoC. The API provides
functionality-based (e.g., keyboard light, backlight) or index-based
addressing of the PWM(s). Duty cycles are represented by a 16-bit value,
where 0 maps to
11 matches
Mail list logo
