On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 9:02 AM Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 11:43 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>
> > Patch is OK with me, should not read patches before the 3rd double espresso
> > next time.
> >
> > I will +1 it, Richard, Johannes, what do you think?
>
> I got dropped off the li
On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 11:43 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> Patch is OK with me, should not read patches before the 3rd double espresso
> next time.
>
> I will +1 it, Richard, Johannes, what do you think?
I got dropped off the list in "The Great Infradead Purge" but I see it
in patchwork ;)
Not s
On 14/07/2020 11:23, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 9:40 AM Anton Ivanov
wrote:
On 04/07/2020 09:52, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
musl toolchain and headers are a bit more strict. These fixes enable building
UML with musl as well as seem not to break on glibc.
Signed-off-by: Ig
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 9:40 AM Anton Ivanov
wrote:
>
>
> On 04/07/2020 09:52, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
> > musl toolchain and headers are a bit more strict. These fixes enable
> > building
> > UML with musl as well as seem not to break on glibc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin
> > ---
> >
On 04/07/2020 09:52, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
musl toolchain and headers are a bit more strict. These fixes enable building
UML with musl as well as seem not to break on glibc.
Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin
---
arch/um/drivers/daemon_user.c | 1 +
arch/um/drivers/pcap_user.c | 12 ++-
musl toolchain and headers are a bit more strict. These fixes enable building
UML with musl as well as seem not to break on glibc.
Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin
---
arch/um/drivers/daemon_user.c | 1 +
arch/um/drivers/pcap_user.c | 12 ++--
arch/um/drivers/slip_user.c | 2 +-
arch
6 matches
Mail list logo
