On 14-09-20, 09:44, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > For LSB bits, I dont think this is an issue. I expect it to work, for
> > example:
> > #define CONTROL_LSB_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
> > foo |= u32_encode_bits(control, CONTROL_LSB_MASK);
> >
> > would mask the control value and program that
On 9/16/20 7:35 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 14-09-20, 09:44, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
For LSB bits, I dont think this is an issue. I expect it to work, for example:
#define CONTROL_LSB_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
foo |= u32_encode_bits(control, CONTROL_LSB_MASK);
would mask the control val
For LSB bits, I dont think this is an issue. I expect it to work, for example:
#define CONTROL_LSB_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
foo |= u32_encode_bits(control, CONTROL_LSB_MASK);
would mask the control value and program that in specific bitfeild.
But for MSB bits, I am not sure above will w
Hi Pierre,
On 11-09-20, 09:50, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > > > > > > > + * 25 0 (Reserved)
> > > > > > > > > + * 24:22 Function Number [2:0]
> > > > > > > > > + * 21 Entity[6]
> > > > > > > > > + * 20:19 Control Selector[5:4]
> > > > > >
Hi Vinod,
+ * 25 0 (Reserved)
+ * 24:22 Function Number [2:0]
+ * 21 Entity[6]
+ * 20:19 Control Selector[5:4]
+ * 18 0 (Reserved)
+ * 17:15 Control Number[5:3]
+ * 14 Next
+ * 13
On 10-09-20, 08:53, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
> On 9/10/20 1:22 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 09-09-20, 08:48, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > + * 25 0 (Reserved)
> > > > > > > + * 24:22 Function Number [2:0]
> > > > > > > + * 21
On 09-09-20, 08:48, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> > > > > + * 25 0 (Reserved)
> > > > > + * 24:22 Function Number [2:0]
> > > > > + * 21 Entity[6]
> > > > > + * 20:19 Control Selector[5:4]
> > > > > + * 18 0 (Reserved)
> > > >
On 08-09-20, 08:33, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> Thanks for the review Vinod,
>
> > This is good, thanks for adding it in changelog. Can you also add this
> > description to Documentation (that can come as an individual patch),
>
> ok
>
> > > +/*
> > > + * v1.2 device - SDCA address mapping
> >
Thanks for the review Vinod,
This is good, thanks for adding it in changelog. Can you also add this
description to Documentation (that can come as an individual patch),
ok
+/*
+ * v1.2 device - SDCA address mapping
+ *
+ * Spec definition
+ * BitsContents
+ * 31
On 01-09-20, 11:22, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> The upcoming SDCA (SoundWire Device Class Audio) specification defines
> a hierarchical encoding to interface with Class-defined capabilities.
>
> The specification is not yet accessible to the general public but this
> information is released with
The upcoming SDCA (SoundWire Device Class Audio) specification defines
a hierarchical encoding to interface with Class-defined capabilities.
The specification is not yet accessible to the general public but this
information is released with explicit permission from the MIPI Board
to avoid delays w
11 matches
Mail list logo
