> On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 18:52 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:42 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> > > > On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > > >> We discussed this during N
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 18:52 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:42 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> > > On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher
> > > > wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > >> We discussed this during NetConf last we
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:42 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> > On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher
> > > wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >> We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct
> that a
> > >> custom sysfs interface is no
> On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher
> > wrote:
> > [...]
> >> We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a
> >> custom sysfs interface is not the way we want to handle this. We agreed
> >> upon a generic interface
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher
> wrote:
> [...]
>> We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a
>> custom sysfs interface is not the way we want to handle this. We
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher
wrote:
[...]
> We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a
> custom sysfs interface is not the way we want to handle this. We agreed
> upon a generic interface so that any NIC is able to turn on or off VF
> multicast promisc
Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Alexander
> > Duyck; Bjørn Mork; e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net;
> > net...@vger.kernel.org; Choi, Sy Jong; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David
> > Laight; Hayato Momma
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control
> >
ceforge.net;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; Choi, Sy Jong; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David
> Laight; Hayato Momma
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control
>
> On 20/02/15 21:05, Skidmore, Donald C wrote:
> > If a vender specific interface is objection
On 20/02/15 21:05, Skidmore, Donald C wrote:
> If a vender specific interface is objectionable maybe a simpler and more
> generic interface would be for the PF to be able to set a given VF into
> "trusted" mode... I admit exactly what 'trusted' meant would vary from vender
> to vender, but it wo
;
Choi, Sy Jong; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Laight; Hayato Momma
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control
On 20/02/15 01:00, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto
>
> Add netlink directives and ndo entry to allow VF multicast promisc
On 20/02/15 01:00, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto
>
> Add netlink directives and ndo entry to allow VF multicast promiscuous mode.
>
> The administrator wants to allow dedicatedly multicast promiscuous per VF.
If I'm properly understanding, this seems to be an ixgbe-specific op
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 01:00 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto
>
> Add netlink directives and ndo entry to allow VF multicast promiscuous
> mode.
>
> The administrator wants to allow dedicatedly multicast promiscuous per
> VF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto
> Revie
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto
Add netlink directives and ndo entry to allow VF multicast promiscuous mode.
The administrator wants to allow dedicatedly multicast promiscuous per VF.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto
Reviewed-by: Hayato Momma
CC: Choi, Sy Jong
---
include/linux/if_link.h | 1
13 matches
Mail list logo
