Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw

2017-11-27 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 09:15:14 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 11/24/2017 06:18 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 07:02:41PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 05:53:01PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > Is there any reason to add the w

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw

2017-11-27 Thread Christian Borntraeger
On 11/24/2017 06:18 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 07:02:41PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 05:53:01PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > Is there any reason to add the whole BSD 3 clause license text? I'd prefer > if it would be just the sim

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw

2017-11-24 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 07:02:41PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 05:53:01PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > > Is there any reason to add the whole BSD 3 clause license text? I'd > > > > prefer > > > > if it would be just the simple new SPDX-License-Identifier above.

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw

2017-11-24 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 05:53:01PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > Is there any reason to add the whole BSD 3 clause license text? I'd prefer > > > if it would be just the simple new SPDX-License-Identifier above. I added it for consistency with other virtio headers. -- MST

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw

2017-11-24 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:21:11PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:09:18PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 07:21:09AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > The original intent of the virtio header relicensing > > > from 2008 was to make sure a

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw

2017-11-24 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:09:54AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 07:21:09 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > The original intent of the virtio header relicensing > > from 2008 was to make sure anyone can implement compatible > > devices/drivers. The virtio-ccw was omitt

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw

2017-11-24 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:09:18PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 07:21:09AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > The original intent of the virtio header relicensing > > from 2008 was to make sure anyone can implement compatible > > devices/drivers. The virtio-ccw was omitt

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw

2017-11-24 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 07:21:09AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > The original intent of the virtio header relicensing > from 2008 was to make sure anyone can implement compatible > devices/drivers. The virtio-ccw was omitted by mistake. > > We have an ack from the only contributor as well as

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw

2017-11-24 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 07:21:09 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > The original intent of the virtio header relicensing > from 2008 was to make sure anyone can implement compatible > devices/drivers. The virtio-ccw was omitted by mistake. > > We have an ack from the only contributor as well as the

[PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw

2017-11-23 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
The original intent of the virtio header relicensing from 2008 was to make sure anyone can implement compatible devices/drivers. The virtio-ccw was omitted by mistake. We have an ack from the only contributor as well as the maintainer from IBM, so it's not too late to fix that. Make it dual-licen