Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf tools: Default to python version 2

2014-08-02 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 12:56:48PM +0200, Thomas Ilsche escreveu: > > Zitat von Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo : > > > Em Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:57:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: > >> According to PEP 394 recommendation [1], it's more portable to use > >> python2 rather than plain python to refer

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf tools: Default to python version 2

2014-08-02 Thread Thomas Ilsche
Zitat von Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo : > Em Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:57:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: >> According to PEP 394 recommendation [1], it's more portable to use >> python2 rather than plain python to refer python binary version 2. >> >> Since there're distros using python3 by default

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf tools: Default to python version 2

2014-08-01 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:57:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: > According to PEP 394 recommendation [1], it's more portable to use > python2 rather than plain python to refer python binary version 2. > > Since there're distros using python3 by default like Arch, and we > don't support python3 (

[PATCH v2 2/2] perf tools: Default to python version 2

2014-07-28 Thread Namhyung Kim
According to PEP 394 recommendation [1], it's more portable to use python2 rather than plain python to refer python binary version 2. Since there're distros using python3 by default like Arch, and we don't support python3 (yet), it'd be better using python2 explicitly. But older versions (prior t