On 06/23/2015 04:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 23/06/2015 04:29, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
If so, can you look at kvm/queue and see if it is okay for you (so that
we can get the series in 4.2)?
Ping?
If I don't get testing results before Wednesday, I'll drop this series
from the 4.2 pull r
On 23/06/2015 04:29, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> If so, can you look at kvm/queue and see if it is okay for you (so that
>>> we can get the series in 4.2)?
>>
>> Ping?
>>
>> If I don't get testing results before Wednesday, I'll drop this series
>> from the 4.2 pull request.
>
> Paolo, sorr
On 06/22/2015 07:24 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 17/06/2015 18:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Also, this loop looks weird. Is this what you wanted?
list_for_each_entry(tmp, &mtrr_state->head, node)
if (cur->base >= tmp->base)
break;
list
On 17/06/2015 18:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Also, this loop looks weird. Is this what you wanted?
>
> list_for_each_entry(tmp, &mtrr_state->head, node)
> if (cur->base >= tmp->base)
> break;
> list_add_tail(&cur->node, &tmp->node);
>
> If
On 15/06/2015 10:55, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> + /* add it to the list if it's valid. */
> + if (var_mtrr_range_is_valid(&mtrr_state->var_ranges[index])) {
> + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &mtrr_state->head, node)
> + if (cur->base < tmp->base)
> +
On 15/06/2015 10:55, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Sort all valid variable MTRRs based on its base address, it will help us to
> check a range to see if it's fully contained in variable MTRRs
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c
Sort all valid variable MTRRs based on its base address, it will help us to
check a range to see if it's fully contained in variable MTRRs
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++
arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c | 63 ++---
ar
7 matches
Mail list logo
