2015-08-13 12:03+0200, Christian Borntraeger:
> Am 13.08.2015 um 11:29 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>> On 13/08/2015 11:11, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> for the new interface. maybe we can rename kvm_check_request in a
> separate patch somewhen.
>>> I wonder why haven't we copied the naming convention
Am 13.08.2015 um 11:29 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>
>
> On 13/08/2015 11:11, Radim Krčmář wrote:
for the new interface. maybe we can rename kvm_check_request in a separate
patch somewhen.
>> I wonder why haven't we copied the naming convention from bit operations
>> (or if programming woul
On 13/08/2015 11:11, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> > for the new interface. maybe we can rename kvm_check_request in a separate
>> > patch somewhen.
> I wonder why haven't we copied the naming convention from bit operations
> (or if programming would be better if German was its language),
>
> kvm_te
2015-08-12 21:57+0200, Christian Borntraeger:
> kvm_check_request is now somewhat a misnomer (what is the difference between
> test and check?)
kvm_check_request has always been poetic; it uses two meanings of
check, "examine" and "tick off", at the same time.
We also want something that clears
Am 05.08.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Radim Krčmář:
> We want to have requests abstracted from bit operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
> ---
kvm_check_request is now somewhat a misnomer (what is the difference between
test and check?)
but still
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger
for the new i
We want to have requests abstracted from bit operations.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 2 +-
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 7 ++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 217f66343dc8..17514fe7d2cb
6 matches
Mail list logo
