On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:15:24 -0700
Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had this on my plate to respond to for a while now, and I haven't
> brought myself to actually care that much about the choice. So I'll
> respond now to keep from leaving you hanging, but I'm not sure I'm that
> helpful :(
No
Hi,
I've had this on my plate to respond to for a while now, and I haven't
brought myself to actually care that much about the choice. So I'll
respond now to keep from leaving you hanging, but I'm not sure I'm that
helpful :(
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:42:18AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On T
Hi Brian,
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:37:51 +0800
Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > MLC and TLC NAND devices are using NAND cells exposing more than one bit,
> > but instead of attaching all the bits in a given cell to a single NA
Hi Boris,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> MLC and TLC NAND devices are using NAND cells exposing more than one bit,
> but instead of attaching all the bits in a given cell to a single NAND
> page, each bit is usually attached to a different page. This concept is
MLC and TLC NAND devices are using NAND cells exposing more than one bit,
but instead of attaching all the bits in a given cell to a single NAND
page, each bit is usually attached to a different page. This concept is
called 'page pairing', and has significant impacts on the flash storage
usage.
The
5 matches
Mail list logo
