Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument

2019-04-10 Thread Stefan Agner
On 09.04.2019 16:50, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi, > > * Stefan Agner [190408 20:59]: >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile >> @@ -41,11 +41,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5) += >> $(omap-4-5-common) $(smp-y) sleep44xx.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AM43XX

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument

2019-04-10 Thread Stefan Agner
On 09.04.2019 14:25, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Stefan Agner writes: > >> The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security >> extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying >> to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build >> errors s

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument

2019-04-09 Thread Stefan Agner
On 09.04.2019 14:25, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Stefan Agner writes: > >> The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security >> extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying >> to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build >> errors s

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument

2019-04-09 Thread Tony Lindgren
Hi, * Stefan Agner [190408 20:59]: > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > @@ -41,11 +41,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5)+= > $(omap-4-5-common) $(smp-y) sleep44xx.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AM43XX) += $(omap-4-5-common) > obj-$(CONFIG_

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument

2019-04-09 Thread Måns Rullgård
Stefan Agner writes: > The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security > extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying > to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build > errors such as this: > clang-8: error: the clang compile

[PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument

2019-04-08 Thread Stefan Agner
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build errors such as this: clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=ar