On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:52 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:00:06AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>> I am slightly confused by your phrasing. Are you:
>>
>> a) saying that you dropped my patches in favor of your own that use
>> platform_device_add_data()
>>
>> or
>>
>> b) asking
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:00:06AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> I am slightly confused by your phrasing. Are you:
>
> a) saying that you dropped my patches in favor of your own that use
> platform_device_add_data()
>
> or
>
> b) asking me to convert my patches to use platform_device_add_data()
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 02:47:10PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 07:07:47AM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>> > Platform device core assumes the ownership of dev.platform_data as
>> > well as that it is dynamically allocated an
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 02:47:10PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 07:07:47AM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> > Platform device core assumes the ownership of dev.platform_data as
> > well as that it is dynamically allocated and it will try to kfree it
> > as a part of platform_devi
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 07:07:47AM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> Platform device core assumes the ownership of dev.platform_data as
> well as that it is dynamically allocated and it will try to kfree it
> as a part of platform_device_release(). Change the code to pass
> kzalloc'ed chunk of memory
Platform device core assumes the ownership of dev.platform_data as
well as that it is dynamically allocated and it will try to kfree it
as a part of platform_device_release(). Change the code to pass
kzalloc'ed chunk of memory instead of a pointer to a static memory to
avoid causing a BUG() when ca
6 matches
Mail list logo
