On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:23:39 +
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 06:16:43PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 12:22:12PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > I guess another solution is to do a copy instead of modifying in place
> > > if
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 06:16:43PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 12:22:12PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > I guess another solution is to do a copy instead of modifying in place
> > if it detects the multiple hard link?
>
> That would be the "transparent" solut
Dne 1.12.2015 v 19:16 Russell King - ARM Linux napsal(a):
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 12:22:12PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> I guess another solution is to do a copy instead of modifying in place
>> if it detects the multiple hard link?
>
> That would be the "transparent" solution. If you think
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 12:22:12PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:10:14 +
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > Another suggestion - maybe recordmcount, which fstat()s the file,
> > should check the st_nlink before modifying the file, and error out
> > with a helpful e
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:10:14 +
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Another suggestion - maybe recordmcount, which fstat()s the file,
> should check the st_nlink before modifying the file, and error out
> with a helpful error message telling people not to use hardlinks,
> which would stop nasty s
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:49:29AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:19:44 +
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > They hardly "do nothing", as the (eg) recordmcount plasters the build
> > log with warnings. A solution to that would be to make recordmcount
> > silent if
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:19:44 +
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> They hardly "do nothing", as the (eg) recordmcount plasters the build
> log with warnings. A solution to that would be to make recordmcount
> silent if the section is already present.
Note, that warning found plenty of bugs wh
On 2015-12-01 17:19, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:07:05PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> So, both recordmcount and the new recordudiv program are idempotent.
>> They check if the to-be-added section is already present and do nothing.
>
> They hardly "do nothing", as
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:07:05PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 2015-11-30 16:40, Michal Marek wrote:
> > On 2015-11-30 16:32, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:11:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> >>> On 2015-11-26 00:47, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Do w
On 2015-11-30 16:40, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 2015-11-30 16:32, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:11:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> On 2015-11-26 00:47, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Do we have any resolution on these programs which modify the object
fil
On 2015-11-30 16:32, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:11:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> On 2015-11-26 00:47, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:51:03PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
The ARM compiler inserts calls to __aeabi_uidiv() and
>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:11:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 2015-11-26 00:47, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:51:03PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> The ARM compiler inserts calls to __aeabi_uidiv() and
> >> __aeabi_idiv() when it needs to perform division on
On 2015-11-26 00:47, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:51:03PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> The ARM compiler inserts calls to __aeabi_uidiv() and
>> __aeabi_idiv() when it needs to perform division on signed and
>> unsigned integers. If a processor has support for the ud
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:51:03PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The ARM compiler inserts calls to __aeabi_uidiv() and
> __aeabi_idiv() when it needs to perform division on signed and
> unsigned integers. If a processor has support for the udiv and
> sdiv division instructions the calls to these sup
The ARM compiler inserts calls to __aeabi_uidiv() and
__aeabi_idiv() when it needs to perform division on signed and
unsigned integers. If a processor has support for the udiv and
sdiv division instructions the calls to these support routines
can be replaced with those instructions. Therefore, reco
15 matches
Mail list logo
