On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 01:43:58PM +0800, Liguo Zhang wrote:
> For platform with auto restart support, between every transfer,
> i2c controller will trigger an interrupt and SW need to handle
> it to start new transfer. When doing write-then-read transfer,
> instead of restart mechanism, using WRRD
On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 16:25 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Liguo Zhang wrote:
> > For platform with auto restart support, between every transfer,
> > i2c controller will trigger an interrupt and SW need to handle
> > it to start new transfer. When doing write-then-
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Liguo Zhang wrote:
>> For platform with auto restart support, between every transfer,
>> i2c controller will trigger an interrupt and SW need to handle
>> it to start new transfer. When doing write-then-read
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Liguo Zhang wrote:
> For platform with auto restart support, between every transfer,
> i2c controller will trigger an interrupt and SW need to handle
> it to start new transfer. When doing write-then-read transfer,
> instead of restart mechanism, using WRRD mode to
For platform with auto restart support, between every transfer,
i2c controller will trigger an interrupt and SW need to handle
it to start new transfer. When doing write-then-read transfer,
instead of restart mechanism, using WRRD mode to have controller
send both transfer in one request to reduce
5 matches
Mail list logo