On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 13:48 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-30-09 at 10:34:58 UTC, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > From: Ian Munsie
> >
> > This adds a new function hash_page_mm() based on the existing hash_page().
> > This version allows any struct mm to be passed in, rather than assumi
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:13 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Michael Neuling writes:
>
> > From: Ian Munsie
> >
> > This adds a new function hash_page_mm() based on the existing hash_page().
> > This version allows any struct mm to be passed in, rather than assuming
> > current. This is useful
On Tue, 2014-30-09 at 10:34:58 UTC, Michael Neuling wrote:
> From: Ian Munsie
>
> This adds a new function hash_page_mm() based on the existing hash_page().
> This version allows any struct mm to be passed in, rather than assuming
> current. This is useful for servicing co-processor faults which
Michael Neuling writes:
> From: Ian Munsie
>
> This adds a new function hash_page_mm() based on the existing hash_page().
> This version allows any struct mm to be passed in, rather than assuming
> current. This is useful for servicing co-processor faults which are not in
> the
> context of th
From: Ian Munsie
This adds a new function hash_page_mm() based on the existing hash_page().
This version allows any struct mm to be passed in, rather than assuming
current. This is useful for servicing co-processor faults which are not in the
context of the current running process.
We need to b
5 matches
Mail list logo