On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 07:50:59AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> 1. There needs to be a way to turn it off to get the performance hit
> under control. I'm leaning toward a boot-time switch, and we can turn
> it into a runtime switch later on. Thoughts?
Yes, we need a runtime switch off for mac
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>
> >> > > Anyway, I booted your config (more or less -- I munged it through
> >> > > virtme-configkernel --update first) with 17 vCPUs and it
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL. I think it's
> in decent shape.
What's the plan of attack? is the goal to get this thing in -rc1 or
as soon as possible thereafter?
If so, I think there are two things that need fixin
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>>
>> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> > > Anyway, I booted your config (more or less -- I munged it through
>> > > virtme-configkernel --update first) with 17 vCPUs and it seems fine.
>> > > Is the issue reliable enough t
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > Anyway, I booted your config (more or less -- I munged it through
> > > virtme-configkernel --update first) with 17 vCPUs and it seems fine.
> > > Is the issue reliable enough to bisect?
> >
> > Ok, it should be bisectable, will try to bi
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Anyway, I booted your config (more or less -- I munged it through
> > virtme-configkernel --update first) with 17 vCPUs and it seems fine.
> > Is the issue reliable enough to bisect?
>
> Ok, it should be bisectable, will try to bisect it.
The latestest entry-stack code
* Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> >> This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL. I think it's
> >> in decent shape.
> >>
> >> Known issues:
> >> - I think we're going to want a way to turn the stack
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> > .Lerror_entry_from_usermode_after_swapgs:
>> > /* Put us onto the real thread stack. */
>> > - leaq8(%rsp), %rdi /* pt_regs pointer */
>> > - movq(%rsp), %r12
>>
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL. I think it's
>> in decent shape.
>>
>> Known issues:
>> - I think we're going to want a way to turn the stack switching on and
>>off either at boot tim
* Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > .Lerror_entry_from_usermode_after_swapgs:
> > /* Put us onto the real thread stack. */
> > - leaq8(%rsp), %rdi /* pt_regs pointer */
> > - movq(%rsp), %r12
> > + popq%r12/* function
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:39:07AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> > This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL. I think it's
>> > in decent shape.
>> >
>> > Known issues:
>> > - I think we're going
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:39:07AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL. I think it's
> > in decent shape.
> >
> > Known issues:
> > - I think we're going to want a way to turn the stack switching on and
> >off ei
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL. I think it's
> > in decent shape.
> >
> > Known issues:
> > - I think we're going to want a way to turn the stack switching on and
> >off either at boot time or at runtime. It
* Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL. I think it's
> in decent shape.
>
> Known issues:
> - I think we're going to want a way to turn the stack switching on and
>off either at boot time or at runtime. It should be fairly straightforward
>to m
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL. I think it's
> > in decent shape.
> >
> > Known issues:
> > - I think we're going to want a way to turn the stack switching on and
> >off either at boot time or at runtime. It
* Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL. I think it's
> in decent shape.
>
> Known issues:
> - I think we're going to want a way to turn the stack switching on and
>off either at boot time or at runtime. It should be fairly straightforward
>to m
This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL. I think it's
in decent shape.
Known issues:
- I think we're going to want a way to turn the stack switching on and
off either at boot time or at runtime. It should be fairly straightforward
to make it work.
- I think the ORC unwinder
17 matches
Mail list logo