On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 08:35:50AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > @@ -3252,6 +3256,7 @@ static const struct vm_operations_struct
> > .fault = special_mapping_fault,
> > .mremap = special_mapping_mremap,
> > .name = special_mapping_name,
> > + .split = special_mappi
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 01:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > So here's a second posting of the VMA based LDT implementation; now without
>> > most of the crazy.
>> >
>> > I took out the
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 01:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > So here's a second posting of the VMA based LDT implementation; now without
> > most of the crazy.
> >
> > I took out the write fault handler and the magic LAR touching code.
> >
> >
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So here's a second posting of the VMA based LDT implementation; now without
> most of the crazy.
>
> I took out the write fault handler and the magic LAR touching code.
>
> Additionally there are a bunch of patches that address generic vm issue.
>
>
So here's a second posting of the VMA based LDT implementation; now without
most of the crazy.
I took out the write fault handler and the magic LAR touching code.
Additionally there are a bunch of patches that address generic vm issue.
- gup() access control; In specific I looked at accessing !
5 matches
Mail list logo