31.07.2012 18:19, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:03:57PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
28.07.2012 01:54, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:55:45PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
Bruce, I feel this patch set is ready for inclusion.
v2:
1) Rebase on B
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:03:57PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 28.07.2012 01:54, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> >On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:55:45PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> >>Bruce, I feel this patch set is ready for inclusion.
> >>
> >>v2:
> >>1) Rebase on Bruce's "for-3.6" branch.
28.07.2012 01:54, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:55:45PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
Bruce, I feel this patch set is ready for inclusion.
v2:
1) Rebase on Bruce's "for-3.6" branch.
This patch set makes grace period and hosts reclaiming network namespace
aware.
On a
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:55:45PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> Bruce, I feel this patch set is ready for inclusion.
>
> v2:
> 1) Rebase on Bruce's "for-3.6" branch.
>
> This patch set makes grace period and hosts reclaiming network namespace
> aware.
On a quick skim--yes, that looks rea
Bruce, I feel this patch set is ready for inclusion.
v2:
1) Rebase on Bruce's "for-3.6" branch.
This patch set makes grace period and hosts reclaiming network namespace
aware.
Main ideas:
1) moving of
unsigned long next_gc;
unsigned long nrhosts;
struct delayed_work g
5 matches
Mail list logo