On Thu, 02 Oct, at 05:04:54PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Yes, we should just get rid of Kconfig and give everyone
> the same kernel like Windows. Much simpler for everyone,
> wouldn't it be?
>
> I'm sure you can easily see the flaws in the argument.
No, not really, since that's not the argument I m
> I didn't include support for that because none of the other x86 pmu
> drivers are buildable as modules. Is there a reason for that?
Not done yet.
Uncore drivers are definitely on the list.
> It's much simpler to just build it in and enable it based on
> CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS + CONFIG_INTEL_CPU.
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:51:24AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Oct, at 02:42:05PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Matt Fleming writes:
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > >
> > > - Added Jiri Olsa's Acked-by to PATCH 02/11.
> > >
> > > - Use x86_match_cpu() in intel_cqm_init() and make sure we gra
On Wed, 01 Oct, at 02:42:05PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Matt Fleming writes:
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> >
> > - Added Jiri Olsa's Acked-by to PATCH 02/11.
> >
> > - Use x86_match_cpu() in intel_cqm_init() and make sure we grab the
> >hotplug lock to prevent races as pointed out by Andi Kleen in
> >
Matt Fleming writes:
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> - Added Jiri Olsa's Acked-by to PATCH 02/11.
>
> - Use x86_match_cpu() in intel_cqm_init() and make sure we grab the
>hotplug lock to prevent races as pointed out by Andi Kleen in
>PATCH 08/11.
>
> - Delete a stale comment in commit message of
From: Matt Fleming
This patch series adds a new PMU driver for the Intel Cache Monitoring
hardware feature available in Intel Xeon processors, which allows
monitoring of LLC occupancy on a task, group or system-wide basis.
The first few patches modify tools/perf to handle per-package counters,
w
6 matches
Mail list logo
