Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] cpufreq: Introduce support for ST's cpufreq functionality

2015-07-08 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 08-07-15, 11:59, Lee Jones wrote: > No problem. So long as it's still on your radar. So, for the first 7 patches: Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar but for the last two: - I thought we agreed that you will have a look at opp-v2 bindings and create your new bindings as an extension of those ? As w

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] cpufreq: Introduce support for ST's cpufreq functionality

2015-07-08 Thread Lee Jones
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24-06-15, 14:58, Lee Jones wrote: > > This driver reads very platform specific information in from Device Tree > > and translates it into frequency tables. The generic drivers then use the > > tables to conduct frequency and voltage scaling in the nor

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] cpufreq: Introduce support for ST's cpufreq functionality

2015-07-08 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 24-06-15, 14:58, Lee Jones wrote: > This driver reads very platform specific information in from Device Tree > and translates it into frequency tables. The generic drivers then use the > tables to conduct frequency and voltage scaling in the normal way. > > There are 'ARM' patches in the set w

[PATCH v2 0/9] cpufreq: Introduce support for ST's cpufreq functionality

2015-06-24 Thread Lee Jones
This driver reads very platform specific information in from Device Tree and translates it into frequency tables. The generic drivers then use the tables to conduct frequency and voltage scaling in the normal way. There are 'ARM' patches in the set which are not necessarily related to CPUFreq, bu