Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Thunderbolt workarounds

2013-07-03 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 08:46:57PM +, Ronciak, John wrote: > Apple does their own thing and do not talk to Intel about it at all. This > includes writing special drivers and user-space components. So we (Intel) > don't know so we can't comment about it. Sorry. The hardware has an Intel par

RE: [PATCH v2 0/8] Thunderbolt workarounds

2013-07-03 Thread Ronciak, John
; linux- > a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; x...@kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Thunderbolt workarounds > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:57:21PM +, Ronciak, John wrote: > > Are you talking about Apple platforms specifically? > > Yeah, that

Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Thunderbolt workarounds

2013-07-03 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:57:21PM +, Ronciak, John wrote: > Are you talking about Apple platforms specifically? Yeah, that's the specific example. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

RE: [PATCH v2 0/8] Thunderbolt workarounds

2013-07-03 Thread Ronciak, John
rnes; > Yinghai Lu; Ronciak, John; Penner, Miles J; Allan, Bruce W; Heikki > Krogerus; Kirill A. Shutemov; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- > a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; x...@kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Thunderbolt workarounds > > On Wed, Jul 0

Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Thunderbolt workarounds

2013-07-03 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:33:11AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:29:00PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Are there any plans to provide native support for the Thunderbolt > > controller, rather than relying on system management mode? > > For what specific hardwar

Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Thunderbolt workarounds

2013-07-03 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:29:00PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Are there any plans to provide native support for the Thunderbolt > controller, rather than relying on system management mode? I believe there are some to implement a native Thunderbolt controller driver but I don't know the detai

Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Thunderbolt workarounds

2013-07-03 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:29:00PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Are there any plans to provide native support for the Thunderbolt > controller, rather than relying on system management mode? For what specific hardware platform? For the ones that this patchset controls, the OS doesn't have acc

Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Thunderbolt workarounds

2013-07-03 Thread Matthew Garrett
Are there any plans to provide native support for the Thunderbolt controller, rather than relying on system management mode? -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org M

[PATCH v2 0/8] Thunderbolt workarounds

2013-07-03 Thread Mika Westerberg
Here's the next revision of the workarounds for Thunderbolt machines. The previous revision can be found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/25/400 The series fixes problems seen in ACPI hotplug driver and resource re-allocation issue in pcibios_resource_survey_bus(). With these applied we have