Zhenzhong,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> On 2019/6/26 21:39, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst clearly explains why it is a
> > bad idea to send random collections of patches especially if some patches
> > are independent and contain bug fixes.
On 2019/6/26 21:39, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst clearly explains why it is a
bad idea to send random collections of patches especially if some patches
are independent and contain bug fixes.
These rules exist for a reason and are not subject to personal
i
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> [PATCH v2 1/7] x86/xen: Mark xen_hvm_need_lapic() and xen_hvm_need_lapic()
> as __init
> [PATCH v2 2/7] x86/jailhouse: Mark jailhouse_x2apic_available as __init
>
> Above two patches only add __init annotation to some functions, not
> related to oth
[PATCH v2 1/7] x86/xen: Mark xen_hvm_need_lapic() and xen_hvm_need_lapic() as
__init
[PATCH v2 2/7] x86/jailhouse: Mark jailhouse_x2apic_available as __init
Above two patches only add __init annotation to some functions, not
related to other patches. I didn't split the two out as following patc
4 matches
Mail list logo
