On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 07:39:50PM +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 17:56 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 10:46 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:00:17PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Today when we run checkers we get
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 17:56 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 10:46 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:00:17PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > > Today when we run checkers we get so many warnings it is too hard to
> > > > make any sense of it.
> >
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 10:46 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:00:17PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > > Today when we run checkers we get so many warnings it is too hard to
> > > make any sense of it.
> >
> > Here is a list of the checkpatch messages for drivers/infiniban
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 10:46 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:00:17PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > > Today when we run checkers we get so many warnings it is too hard to
> > > make any sense of it.
> >
> > Here is a list of the checkpatch messages for drivers/infiniban
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 02:05:15PM +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/compare/master...knuto:runchecks
Several of these to rdma/core do not look so big, you should think
about sending them..
Jason
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:00:17PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Today when we run checkers we get so many warnings it is too hard to
> > make any sense of it.
>
> Here is a list of the checkpatch messages for drivers/infiniband
> sorted by type.
>
> Many of these might be corrected by using
>
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 07:30 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 14:05 +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> > > Here is a list of the checkpatch messages for drivers/infiniband
> > > sorted by type.
> > >
> > > Many of these might be corrected by using
> > >
> > > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 14:05 +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> > Here is a list of the checkpatch messages for drivers/infiniband
> > sorted by type.
> >
> > Many of these might be corrected by using
> >
> > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --fix-inplace --types= \
> > $(git ls-files drivers/infiniband/)
>
On Sun, 2017-12-17 at 22:00 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 03:14:10AM +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
>
> > > I like the ability to add more checkers and keep then in the main
> > > upstream tree. But adding overrides for specific subsystems goes against
> > > the policy that all
On Sun, 2017-12-17 at 22:00 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-12-17 at 22:00 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 03:14:10AM +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> >
> > > > I like the ability to add more checkers and keep then in the main
> > > > upstream tree. But adding override
On Sun, 2017-12-17 at 22:00 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 03:14:10AM +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
>
> > > I like the ability to add more checkers and keep then in the main
> > > upstream tree. But adding overrides for specific subsystems goes against
> > > the policy that all
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 03:14:10AM +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> > I like the ability to add more checkers and keep then in the main
> > upstream tree. But adding overrides for specific subsystems goes against
> > the policy that all subsystems should be treated equally.
>
> This is a tool to enable
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 09:47 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:42:25 +0100
> Knut Omang wrote:
>
> > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on
> > the
> > entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing.
> >
> > This is done by rep
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 09:47 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:42:25 +0100
> Knut Omang wrote:
>
> > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on
> > the
> > entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing.
> >
> > This is done by rep
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:42:25 +0100
Knut Omang wrote:
> This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on the
> entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing.
>
> This is done by replacing the sparse specific setup for the C={1,2} variable
> in the makefiles wi
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 09:00 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 17:27 +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 07:21 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> > > > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run ch
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 17:27 +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 07:21 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> > > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers
> > > on the
> > > entire kernel as part of automatic
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 07:21 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on
> > the
> > entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing.
>
> This seems like a useful and reason
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on the
> entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing.
This seems like a useful and reasonable series, thanks.
Do please take Julia's grammar updates.
How is
This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on the
entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing.
This is done by replacing the sparse specific setup for the C={1,2} variable
in the makefiles with setup for running scripts/runchecks, a new program that
can ru
20 matches
Mail list logo
