On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:36 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 04:50:38PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:47 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Are those diffs correct when usin
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:31 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:07:24PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > Maybe this should be:
> > >
> > > [ arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile ]
> > >
> > > -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -include hidden.h
> > > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -include ./hidde
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:07 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
...
> > > patchset to previous build:
> > >
> > > $ git log --no-merges --oneline
> > > 5.7.0-rc7-1-amd64-clang..5.7.0-rc7-2-amd64-clang
> > > 8b74901cb9e5
> > > (for-5.7/x86-boot-remove-runtime-relocations-from-compressed-kernel-v2-nivedita76
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:36 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 04:50:38PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:47 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Are those diffs correct when usin
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 04:50:38PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:47 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > >
> > > Are those diffs correct when using "x86/boot: Correct relocation
> > > destination on old linkers"?
>
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:07:24PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Maybe this should be:
> >
> > [ arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile ]
> >
> > -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -include hidden.h
> > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -include ./hidden.h
> >
>
> NOPE.
>
> This works:
>
> [ arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefi
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:55 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:48 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:44 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:33 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:30 PM Ard Biesheuvel wro
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:48 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:44 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:33 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:30 PM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 14:29, Sedat Dilek wrote
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:47 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > Are those diffs correct when using "x86/boot: Correct relocation
> > destination on old linkers"?
> >
>
> It looks ok, but that patch (and even marking the other symbols .h
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:44 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:33 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:30 PM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 14:29, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:59 AM Arvind Sankar
>
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> Are those diffs correct when using "x86/boot: Correct relocation
> destination on old linkers"?
>
It looks ok, but that patch (and even marking the other symbols .hidden)
should be unnecessary after this series.
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:33 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:30 PM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 14:29, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:59 AM Arvind Sankar
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The compressed kernel currently contains
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:30 PM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 14:29, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:59 AM Arvind Sankar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The compressed kernel currently contains bogus runtime relocations in
> > > the startup code in head_{32,64}.S
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 14:29, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:59 AM Arvind Sankar wrote:
> >
> > The compressed kernel currently contains bogus runtime relocations in
> > the startup code in head_{32,64}.S, which are generated by the linker,
> > but must not actually be processe
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:59 AM Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> The compressed kernel currently contains bogus runtime relocations in
> the startup code in head_{32,64}.S, which are generated by the linker,
> but must not actually be processed at runtime.
>
> This generates warnings when linking with th
The compressed kernel currently contains bogus runtime relocations in
the startup code in head_{32,64}.S, which are generated by the linker,
but must not actually be processed at runtime.
This generates warnings when linking with the BFD linker, and errors
with LLD, which defaults to erroring on r
16 matches
Mail list logo
