Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] task: Making tasks on the runqueue rcu protected

2019-09-25 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Peter Zijlstra writes: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:38:04PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Linus Torvalds writes: > >> > Can anybody see anything wrong with the series? Because I'd love to >> > have it for 5.4, >> >> Peter, >> >> I am more than happy for these to come through your tree. H

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] task: Making tasks on the runqueue rcu protected

2019-09-25 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:38:04PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Linus Torvalds writes: > > Can anybody see anything wrong with the series? Because I'd love to > > have it for 5.4, > > Peter, > > I am more than happy for these to come through your tree. However > if this is one thing to ma

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] task: Making tasks on the runqueue rcu protected

2019-09-17 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Linus Torvalds writes: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 5:30 AM Eric W. Biederman > wrote: >> >> I have reworked these patches one more time to make it clear that the >> first 3 patches only fix task_struct so that it experiences a rcu grace >> period after it leaves the runqueue for the last time. >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] task: Making tasks on the runqueue rcu protected

2019-09-14 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 5:30 AM Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > I have reworked these patches one more time to make it clear that the > first 3 patches only fix task_struct so that it experiences a rcu grace > period after it leaves the runqueue for the last time. I remain a fan of these patches, an