Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation

Any comments on this? On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 08:41:21PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hi, > > Many architectures implement free_initmem() in exactly the same or very > similar way: they wrap the call to free_initmem_default() with sometimes > different 'poison' parameter. > > These patches swit

[PATCH v2 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation

Hi, Many architectures implement free_initmem() in exactly the same or very similar way: they wrap the call to free_initmem_default() with sometimes different 'poison' parameter. These patches switch those architectures to use a generic implementation that does free_initmem_default(POISON_FREE_IN