Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] per-cgroup numa suite

Hi, Folks Please feel free to comment if you got any concerns :-) Hi, Peter How do you think about this version? Please let us know if it's still not good enough to be accepted :-) Regards, Michael Wang On 2019/7/16 上午11:38, 王贇 wrote: > During our torturing on numa stuff, we found problems li

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] per-cgroup numa suite

Hi, Peter Now we have all these stuff in cpu cgroup, with the new statistic folks should be able to estimate their per-cgroup workloads on numa platform, and numa group + cling would help to address the issue when their workloads can't be settled on one node. How do you think about this version :

[PATCH v2 0/4] per-cgroup numa suite

During our torturing on numa stuff, we found problems like: * missing per-cgroup information about the per-node execution status * missing per-cgroup information about the numa locality That is when we have a cpu cgroup running with bunch of tasks, no good way to tell how it's tasks are deali