Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpiolib: some fixup patches

2013-02-27 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Grant Likely > wrote: > >> I've been playing with an idea of pulling in some basic MMIO gpio >> access directly into gpiolib so that when appropriate gpiolib itself >> can have a fast path for doing the regi

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpiolib: some fixup patches

2013-02-27 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > I've been playing with an idea of pulling in some basic MMIO gpio > access directly into gpiolib so that when appropriate gpiolib itself > can have a fast path for doing the register access and shadow register > management. Shadow registers:

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpiolib: some fixup patches

2013-02-27 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > While you're working on that, I'd like you to keep the following in > mind. I'm getting concerned with the level of overhead that the gpio > access routines are incuring. They're doing a lot of checks right now > when with GPIOs we want it to

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpiolib: some fixup patches

2013-02-26 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Grant Likely > wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:19:44 +0900, Alexandre Courbot >> wrote: >>> Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix code that >>> you merged recently, so I'd be glad

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpiolib: some fixup patches

2013-02-26 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:19:44 +0900, Alexandre Courbot > wrote: >> Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix code that >> you merged recently, so I'd be glad if they could be squashed into the >> patch mentioned in the descri

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpiolib: some fixup patches

2013-02-26 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:19:44 +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix code that > you merged recently, so I'd be glad if they could be squashed into the > patch mentioned in the description. They won't get squashed in because the tree is already

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpiolib: some fixup patches

2013-02-21 Thread Alexandre Courbot
Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix code that you merged recently, so I'd be glad if they could be squashed into the patch mentioned in the description. Thanks, Alex. On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > This short series is a fixup to patch 6/9 of

[PATCH v2 0/4] gpiolib: some fixup patches

2013-02-14 Thread Alexandre Courbot
This short series is a fixup to patch 6/9 of my previous series ("gpiolib: use descriptors internally"), which mainly addresses issues raised by Linus W. in this patch and a few other minor ones caught while proof-reading gpiolib. First patch is the most significant. It mostly avoids oopses when p