Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] gpio: twl4030: Correct status reporting for outputs

2012-12-12 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
On 12/12/2012 12:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > I will take a look at it this week Thanks > but I cannot pick it up for v3.8 unless it is a regression bug fix from > v3.6. It will have to wait for v3.9 and it can be merged into linux-next > after the v3.8 merge window closes. 3.9 is fine. the gpio

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] gpio: twl4030: Correct status reporting for outputs

2012-12-12 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On 12/07/2012 09:09 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Peter Ujfalusi >> wrote: >> >>> As Grant commneted on the first version: >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/5/53 >>> >>> Introduce bitfields to

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] gpio: twl4030: Correct status reporting for outputs

2012-12-12 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
Hi Grant, On 12/07/2012 09:09 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > >> As Grant commneted on the first version: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/5/53 >> >> Introduce bitfields to cache the directionand output status of the pins so we >> can report th

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] gpio: twl4030: Correct status reporting for outputs

2012-12-07 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > As Grant commneted on the first version: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/5/53 > > Introduce bitfields to cache the directionand output status of the pins so we > can report them correctly. > To do this I did some cleanup within the driver t

[PATCH v2 0/3] gpio: twl4030: Correct status reporting for outputs

2012-12-06 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
Hi, As Grant commneted on the first version: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/5/53 Introduce bitfields to cache the directionand output status of the pins so we can report them correctly. To do this I did some cleanup within the driver to get rid of the global variables and moved them under a privat