Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] add fault injection to user memory access

Hi Andrew, On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 6:27 PM Akinobu Mita wrote: > > Andrew, > > Could you take a look at this series, and consider taking in -mm tree? Please consider picking v3 patches that address Peter's comments instead. > > 2020年9月1日(火) 0:49 Alexander Potapenko : > > > > > This series looks

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] add fault injection to user memory access

Andrew, Could you take a look at this series, and consider taking in -mm tree? 2020年9月1日(火) 0:49 Alexander Potapenko : > > > This series looks good to me. > > Great! > > Which tree do fault injection patches normally go to? > > > Reviewed-by: Akinobu Mita > > Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] add fault injection to user memory access

> This series looks good to me. Great! Which tree do fault injection patches normally go to? > Reviewed-by: Akinobu Mita Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] add fault injection to user memory access

2020年8月28日(金) 23:14 : > > From: Albert van der Linde > > The goal of this series is to improve testing of fault-tolerance in > usages of user memory access functions, by adding support for fault > injection. > > The first patch adds failure injection capability for usercopy > functions. The second

[PATCH v2 0/3] add fault injection to user memory access

From: Albert van der Linde The goal of this series is to improve testing of fault-tolerance in usages of user memory access functions, by adding support for fault injection. The first patch adds failure injection capability for usercopy functions. The second changes usercopy functions to use thi