On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:22:40PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Remi,
>
> Am 29.11.2015 um 01:31 schrieb Remi Pommarel:
> >Hi Stefan,
> >
> >On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:52:07PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> >>i applied the series including the devicetree modification, but it
> >>doesn't work fo
Hi Remi,
Am 29.11.2015 um 01:31 schrieb Remi Pommarel:
Hi Stefan,
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:52:07PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
i applied the series including the devicetree modification, but it
doesn't work for me.
First of all i get an ugly division by zero warning from the pwm
driver. The
Hi Stefan,
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:52:07PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> i applied the series including the devicetree modification, but it
> doesn't work for me.
>
> First of all i get an ugly division by zero warning from the pwm
> driver. The pwm driver still assume a fixed clock and doesn'
Hi Remi,
hi Eric,
Am 11.11.2015 um 15:22 schrieb Remi Pommarel:
Hi,
This patchset adds support for pwm clock. At boot, this clock does not have a
default parent nor a default rate set. Thus we should be able to change its
parent to get this clock working. The current clock implementation is usi
Hi,
This patchset adds support for pwm clock. At boot, this clock does not have a
default parent nor a default rate set. Thus we should be able to change its
parent to get this clock working. The current clock implementation is using a
mux to select the parent, but these clocks need to add a passw
5 matches
Mail list logo