Gentle Ping...
Hi Alexander and other net bpf guys, it would be great if you could share your
feedback whenever you have a moment. Please do let me know if there's any
additional change needed.
Thanks,
Saket
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 08:54:00PM +0530, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote:
>
> On 05/03/25 1
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 08:54:00PM +0530, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote:
>
> On 05/03/25 10:43 pm, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
> > For platforms on powerpc architecture with a default page size greater
> > than 4096, there was an inconsistency in fragment size calculation.
> > This caused the BPF self
On 05/03/25 10:43 pm, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
For platforms on powerpc architecture with a default page size greater
than 4096, there was an inconsistency in fragment size calculation.
This caused the BPF selftest xdp_adjust_tail/xdp_adjust_frags_tail_grow
to fail on powerpc.
The issue occu
For platforms on powerpc architecture with a default page size greater
than 4096, there was an inconsistency in fragment size calculation.
This caused the BPF selftest xdp_adjust_tail/xdp_adjust_frags_tail_grow
to fail on powerpc.
The issue occurred because the fragment buffer size in
bpf_prog_tes
4 matches
Mail list logo