On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:32:00AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:01:49AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > The setup for LTO never made it upstream, and although this has
> > some users, this is now really old stuff for a gcc 4.7 LTO problem.
> > We know that at least LTO_
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:01:49AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> The setup for LTO never made it upstream, and although this has
> some users, this is now really old stuff for a gcc 4.7 LTO problem.
> We know that at least LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() work around can
> be removed if LTO is not supp
The setup for LTO never made it upstream, and although this has
some users, this is now really old stuff for a gcc 4.7 LTO problem.
We know that at least LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() work around can
be removed if LTO is not supported on v4.7 anymore.
As per Andi the DISABLE_LTO and LTO_CFLAGS are stil
3 matches
Mail list logo