On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 4:48 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:42:24AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 6:59 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:40:20AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > > > Convert this unit test to a K
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:42:24AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 6:59 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:40:20AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > > Convert this unit test to a KUnit test. This allows the test to benefit
> > > from the KUnit too
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 6:59 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:40:20AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > Convert this unit test to a KUnit test. This allows the test to benefit
> > from the KUnit tooling. Note that care is taken to avoid test-ending
> > assertions in worker
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:40:20AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> Convert this unit test to a KUnit test. This allows the test to benefit
> from the KUnit tooling. Note that care is taken to avoid test-ending
> assertions in worker threads, which is unsafe in KUnit (and wasn't done
> before this
Convert this unit test to a KUnit test. This allows the test to benefit
from the KUnit tooling. Note that care is taken to avoid test-ending
assertions in worker threads, which is unsafe in KUnit (and wasn't done
before this change either).
Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein
---
I tested this using:
5 matches
Mail list logo