On 07/25/2013 03:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> regs_phys is phys_addr_t (u32 or u64).
>> Lets retype it to u64.
>
> This no longer matches the actual patch?
I need some holidays.
Will send v3.
Sorry,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
> regs_phys is phys_addr_t (u32 or u64).
> Lets retype it to u64.
This no longer matches the actual patch?
> Fixes compilation warning introduced by:
> video: xilinxfb: Use drvdata->regs_phys instead of physaddr
> (sha1: c88fafef0135e1e1c3e23c
regs_phys is phys_addr_t (u32 or u64).
Lets retype it to u64.
Fixes compilation warning introduced by:
video: xilinxfb: Use drvdata->regs_phys instead of physaddr
(sha1: c88fafef0135e1e1c3e23c3e32ccbeeabc587f81)
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
Changes in v2:
- Use %pa instead of casting
ppc44x_
3 matches
Mail list logo