* Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:09:30 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt
> >
> > What tree is this against? It does not apply.
>
> Hmm, my tree which is based on 4.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:09:30 +0100
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt
>
> What tree is this against? It does not apply.
Hmm, my tree which is based on 4.5-rc7.
-- Steve
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt
What tree is this against? It does not apply.
While testing the tracer preemptoff, I hit this strange trace:
# cmd pid | time | caller
# \ / | \| /
<...>-259 0...10us : schedule <-worker_thread
<...>-259 0d..10us : rcu_note_context_switch <-__schedule
<...>-259 0
4 matches
Mail list logo