On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:19:27AM +1000, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva
>
> The upstream commit:
> 22e9c88d486a ("powerpc/64: reuse PPC32 static inline flush_dcache_range()")
> has a similar effect, but since it is a rewrite of the assembler to C, is
> too invasive for stable.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:08:26PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 26/08/2019 à 18:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman a écrit :
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:19:27AM +1000, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> > > From: Alastair D'Silva
> > >
> > > The upstream commit:
> > > 22e9c88d486a ("powerpc/64: reuse
"Alastair D'Silva" writes:
> From: Alastair D'Silva
>
> The upstream commit:
> 22e9c88d486a ("powerpc/64: reuse PPC32 static inline flush_dcache_range()")
> has a similar effect, but since it is a rewrite of the assembler to C, is
> too invasive for stable. This patch is a minimal fix to address
Le 26/08/2019 à 18:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:19:27AM +1000, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
From: Alastair D'Silva
The upstream commit:
22e9c88d486a ("powerpc/64: reuse PPC32 static inline flush_dcache_range()")
has a similar effect, but since it is a rewrite of th
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:19:27AM +1000, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva
>
> The upstream commit:
> 22e9c88d486a ("powerpc/64: reuse PPC32 static inline flush_dcache_range()")
> has a similar effect, but since it is a rewrite of the assembler to C, is
> too invasive for stable.
From: Alastair D'Silva
The upstream commit:
22e9c88d486a ("powerpc/64: reuse PPC32 static inline flush_dcache_range()")
has a similar effect, but since it is a rewrite of the assembler to C, is
too invasive for stable. This patch is a minimal fix to address the issue in
assembler.
This patch app
6 matches
Mail list logo