com; andy.shevche...@gmail.com;
> > alex.h...@canonical.com; a...@infradead.org; platform-driver-
> > x...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; r...@rjwysocki.net
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: intel-hid: Add support for Device
> > Specific
> &g
x...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; r...@rjwysocki.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: intel-hid: Add support for Device
> Specific
> Methods
>
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:38:16AM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> > > -Original
Limonciello, Mario; Alex Hung; Andy Shevchenko; Platform Driver; Linux
> > Kernel
> > Mailing List; Rafael J. Wysocki
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: intel-hid: Add support for Device
> > Specific
> > Methods
> >
> > On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 16:59
st; Rafael J. Wysocki
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: intel-hid: Add support for Device
> Specific
> Methods
>
> On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 16:59 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 05:06:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2
On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-07-07 at 19:24 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 6:48 AM, wrote:
>> > > I strongly advocate for vendors to have more control over their
>> > > drivers,
>> > > but this scenario really frustrates me. I
On Sat, 2018-07-07 at 19:24 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 6:48 AM, wrote:
> > > I strongly advocate for vendors to have more control over their
> > > drivers,
> > > but this scenario really frustrates me. I don't think I can
> > > justify this
> > > to Linus as a fix. But
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 6:48 AM, wrote:
>>I strongly advocate for vendors to have more control over their drivers,
>>but this scenario really frustrates me. I don't think I can justify this
>>to Linus as a fix. But before we just say "no" (because hey, I want
>>these fixes available as early as po
On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 16:59 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 05:06:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 4:51 PM,
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > > So there are some customers who will have issue with power
> > > > > button
> > > > > without this patch, so it sh
>I strongly advocate for vendors to have more control over their drivers,
>but this scenario really frustrates me. I don't think I can justify this
>to Linus as a fix. But before we just say "no" (because hey, I want
>these fixes available as early as possible too), let's ask Rafael if he
>has an o
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 05:06:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 4:51 PM, wrote:
>
> >> > So there are some customers who will have issue with power button
> >> > without this patch, so it should be also marked for stable also.
> >> > Also this may be a candidate for 4.1
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 4:51 PM, wrote:
>> > So there are some customers who will have issue with power button
>> > without this patch, so it should be also marked for stable also.
>> > Also this may be a candidate for 4.18-rcX.
>> >
>>
>> I'm not sure Greg will take this selling point for rather
Wysocki
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: intel-hid: Add support for Device
> Specific
> Methods
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 16:44 +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> >> >
> >
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada
wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 16:44 +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
>> >
>
> [...]
>
>> I verified this on XPS 9370 FW 1.3.2 (which contains this alternate
>> HEBC interface).
>> Power button works again for wakeup from s2idle.
>>
>> T
On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 16:44 +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> >
[...]
> I verified this on XPS 9370 FW 1.3.2 (which contains this alternate
> HEBC interface).
> Power button works again for wakeup from s2idle.
>
> Tested-by: Mario Limonciello
>
So there are some customers who will ha
kernel.org;
> r...@rjwysocki.net; Limonciello, Mario; Srinivas Pandruvada
> Subject: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: intel-hid: Add support for Device Specific
> Methods
>
> In some of the recent platforms, it is possible that stand alone methods
> for HEBC() or other methods used in this dri
In some of the recent platforms, it is possible that stand alone methods
for HEBC() or other methods used in this driver may not exist. In this
case intel-hid driver will fail to load and power button will not be
functional.
It is also possible that some quirks in this driver added for some
platfo
16 matches
Mail list logo