On 09/28/2018 12:17 PM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 09/28/2018 03:32 PM, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote:
>> I can rework the patch to use the is_supported() member function. The
>> down side is that the test does not show up in the list of executed tests
>> anymore,
>> unless some debug o
Hi Thomas,
On 09/28/2018 03:32 PM, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote:
> I can rework the patch to use the is_supported() member function. The
> down side is that the test does not show up in the list of executed tests
> anymore,
> unless some debug output is enabled:
Which should be fine because s390 is
On 09/28/2018 10:37 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 09/28/2018 01:13 PM, Thomas Richter wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
>> b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
>> index 54ca7d87236f..e83c15a95c43 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/
Hi Thomas,
On 09/28/2018 01:13 PM, Thomas Richter wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> index 54ca7d87236f..e83c15a95c43 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static struct te
S390 does not support the perf_event_open system call for
attribute type PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT. This results in test
failure for test 22:
[root@s8360046 perf]# ./perf test 22
22: Watchpoint:
22.1: Read Only Watchpoint: FAILED!
22.2: Write Only Wat
5 matches
Mail list logo