On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> I was hoping that would be it. Have there been reports since that I
>> haven't seen?
>
> Not that I have seen.
Ok. So as far as I can see we can ignore this for now (at at least be
no worse off than we used to be).
I didn't check *why* ppdev_i
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 06:44:12AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > A bit better commit message here would have caused me to notice it.
> > Something like "Revert a broken patch because it crashes all of our
> > machines without it!!!" would be
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> A bit better commit message here would have caused me to notice it.
> Something like "Revert a broken patch because it crashes all of our
> machines without it!!!" would be a hint it needed to go in :)
Didn't my revert of e7223f1860 fix this?
>
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 06:47:36PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2016 06:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 06:26:08AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:32:55AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:40:10PM +0
On Tuesday 05 April 2016 06:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 06:26:08AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:32:55AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:40:10PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
If the parport bus is not yet registered and any dev
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 06:26:08AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:32:55AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:40:10PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > If the parport bus is not yet registered and any device using parallel
> > > port tries to regi
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:13:12PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2016 7:10 AM, "Sudip Mukherjee"
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Ross,
> > Can you please test this patch in your setup. This is a respin of the
> > previous patch in another way.
>
> This seems to have the exact same problem as th
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:32:55AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:40:10PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > If the parport bus is not yet registered and any device using parallel
> > port tries to register with the bus we get a stackdump with a message
> > of Kernel bug.
>
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:40:10PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> If the parport bus is not yet registered and any device using parallel
> port tries to register with the bus we get a stackdump with a message
> of Kernel bug.
>
> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu
> Cc: # 4.2+
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Muk
If the parport bus is not yet registered and any device using parallel
port tries to register with the bus we get a stackdump with a message
of Kernel bug.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu
Cc: # 4.2+
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee
---
Hi Ross,
Can you please test this patch in your setup. This is a r
10 matches
Mail list logo
