From: Herbert Xu
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:55:39 +0800
> The memory barrier in the helper wq_has_sleeper is needed by just
> about every user of waitqueue_active. This patch generalises it
> by making it take a wait_queue_head_t directly. The existing
> helper is renamed to skwq_has_sleeper.
>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:37:29AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>
> > Would be easier to refer to the comment that now adorns
> > waitqueue_active().
>
> Yeah, that might be a good idea. Herbert can you adjust this?
Sure, here is an updated patch. Note that this patch is based
on net-next where t
2 matches
Mail list logo
