On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 09:07:27PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I don't much like my original use of the name "swap_index", when it was
> not the index in a swapfile (though it was the index in the radix tree);
> but it will become a correct name with your patch.
>
> Though Matthew Wilcox seems to
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Yu Zhao wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 02:11:27PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, Yu Zhao wrote:
> >
> > > We used to have a single swap address space with swp_entry_t.val
> > > as its radix tree index. This is not the case anymore. Now Each
> > > swp_typ
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 02:11:27PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, Yu Zhao wrote:
>
> > We used to have a single swap address space with swp_entry_t.val
> > as its radix tree index. This is not the case anymore. Now Each
> > swp_type() has its own address space and should use swp
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, Yu Zhao wrote:
> We used to have a single swap address space with swp_entry_t.val
> as its radix tree index. This is not the case anymore. Now Each
> swp_type() has its own address space and should use swp_offset()
> as radix tree index.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao
This fix
We used to have a single swap address space with swp_entry_t.val
as its radix tree index. This is not the case anymore. Now Each
swp_type() has its own address space and should use swp_offset()
as radix tree index.
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao
---
mm/shmem.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 inserti
5 matches
Mail list logo
