On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:40:45AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Ganesh,
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:26:12AM +0800, Ganesh Mahendran wrote:
> > Hello Minchan
> >
> > 2014-12-20 10:25 GMT+08:00 Minchan Kim :
> > > Hey Ganesh,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 09:43:34AM +0800, Ganesh Mahendr
Hi Ganesh,
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:26:12AM +0800, Ganesh Mahendran wrote:
> Hello Minchan
>
> 2014-12-20 10:25 GMT+08:00 Minchan Kim :
> > Hey Ganesh,
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 09:43:34AM +0800, Ganesh Mahendran wrote:
> >> 2014-12-20 8:23 GMT+08:00 Minchan Kim :
> >> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2
Hello Minchan
2014-12-20 10:25 GMT+08:00 Minchan Kim :
> Hey Ganesh,
>
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 09:43:34AM +0800, Ganesh Mahendran wrote:
>> 2014-12-20 8:23 GMT+08:00 Minchan Kim :
>> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:17:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:10:43 +0900 Minchan
Hey Ganesh,
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 09:43:34AM +0800, Ganesh Mahendran wrote:
> 2014-12-20 8:23 GMT+08:00 Minchan Kim :
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:17:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:10:43 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>
> >> > > It involves rehashing a lengthy argum
2014-12-20 8:23 GMT+08:00 Minchan Kim :
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:17:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:10:43 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
>>
>> > > It involves rehashing a lengthy argument with Greg.
>> >
>> > Okay. Then, Ganesh,
>> > please add warn message about duplicaed
Hello Andrew,
Thanks for your review.
2014-12-20 6:32 GMT+08:00 Andrew Morton :
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:55:19 +0800 Ganesh Mahendran
> wrote:
>
>> Keeping fragmentation of zsmalloc in a low level is our target. But now
>> we still need to add the debug code in zsmalloc to get the quantitative
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 09:23:03AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:17:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:10:43 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
> >
> > > > It involves rehashing a lengthy argument with Greg.
> > >
> > > Okay. Then, Ganesh,
> > > please add
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:17:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:10:43 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > > It involves rehashing a lengthy argument with Greg.
> >
> > Okay. Then, Ganesh,
> > please add warn message about duplicaed name possibility althoug
> > it's unlikely as
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:10:43 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
> > It involves rehashing a lengthy argument with Greg.
>
> Okay. Then, Ganesh,
> please add warn message about duplicaed name possibility althoug
> it's unlikely as it is.
Oh, getting EEXIST is easy with this patch. Just create and destroy
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:06:48PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 08:58:52 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:45:48PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 08:39:37 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > > Then, we should fix debugfs_creat
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 08:58:52 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:45:48PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 08:39:37 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
> >
> > > Then, we should fix debugfs_create_dir can return errno to propagate the
> > > error
> > > to end user who
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:45:48PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 08:39:37 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > Then, we should fix debugfs_create_dir can return errno to propagate the
> > error
> > to end user who can know it was failed ENOMEM or EEXIST.
>
> Impractical. Every ca
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 08:39:37 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
> Then, we should fix debugfs_create_dir can return errno to propagate the error
> to end user who can know it was failed ENOMEM or EEXIST.
Impractical. Every caller of every debugfs interface will need to be
changed!
It's really irritating
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 02:32:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:55:19 +0800 Ganesh Mahendran
> wrote:
>
> > Keeping fragmentation of zsmalloc in a low level is our target. But now
> > we still need to add the debug code in zsmalloc to get the quantitative
> > data.
> >
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:55:19 +0800 Ganesh Mahendran
wrote:
> Keeping fragmentation of zsmalloc in a low level is our target. But now
> we still need to add the debug code in zsmalloc to get the quantitative data.
>
> This patch adds a new configuration CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_STAT to enable the
> stati
Keeping fragmentation of zsmalloc in a low level is our target. But now
we still need to add the debug code in zsmalloc to get the quantitative data.
This patch adds a new configuration CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_STAT to enable the
statistics collection for developers. Currently only the objects statatitics
16 matches
Mail list logo