Hi,
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > > But can you take a look at distingushing between non-selectable options
> > > due to dependency issues and seleted-by symbols.
> >
> > Do you have an example in mind? If a symbol is not changable
On Sunday 16 of September 2007 20:41:10 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 08:04:10PM +0200, Matej Laitl wrote:
> > menuconfig currently represents options implied by another option ('select'
> > directive in Kconfig) by prefixing them with '---'. Unfortunately the same
> > notation is u
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 08:04:10PM +0200, Matej Laitl wrote:
> menuconfig currently represents options implied by another option ('select'
> directive in Kconfig) by prefixing them with '---'. Unfortunately the same
> notation is used for comments.
This is easy to fix - example below.
Now a commen
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 07:10:06PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > But can you take a look at distingushing between non-selectable options
> > due to dependency issues and seleted-by symbols.
>
> Do you have an example in mind? If a symbol is n
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> But can you take a look at distingushing between non-selectable options
> due to dependency issues and seleted-by symbols.
Do you have an example in mind? If a symbol is not changable, but still
visible, a select is usually involved.
bye, Roman
-
Hi,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Matej Laitl wrote:
> menuconfig currently represents options implied by another option ('select'
> directive in Kconfig) by prefixing them with '---'. Unfortunately the same
> notation is used for comments.
>
> This patch changes notation of selected-by-another items by
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 08:04:10PM +0200, Matej Laitl wrote:
> menuconfig currently represents options implied by another option ('select'
> directive in Kconfig) by prefixing them with '---'. Unfortunately the same
> notation is used for comments.
>
> This patch changes notation of selected-by-an
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:04:10 +0200 Matej Laitl wrote:
> menuconfig currently represents options implied by another option ('select'
> directive in Kconfig) by prefixing them with '---'. Unfortunately the same
> notation is used for comments.
>
> This patch changes notation of selected-by-another
On Saturday 15 of September 2007 20:38:14 you wrote:
> On Sep 15 2007 20:04, Matej Laitl wrote:
> >This patch changes notation of selected-by-another items by introducing 2
> > new representations for implied options:
> >{*} or {M} for options selected by another modularized one, thus builtin
> > o
On Sep 15 2007 20:04, Matej Laitl wrote:
>
>This patch changes notation of selected-by-another items by introducing 2 new
>representations for implied options:
>{*} or {M} for options selected by another modularized one, thus builtin or
>module capable,
>-*- or -M- for options that cannot be at th
On Saturday 15 of September 2007 20:04:10 Matej Laitl wrote:
> menuconfig currently represents options implied by another option ('select'
> directive in Kconfig) by prefixing them with '---'. Unfortunately the same
> notation is used for comments.
>
> (...)
Oh please reply to my address [EMAIL PR
menuconfig currently represents options implied by another option ('select'
directive in Kconfig) by prefixing them with '---'. Unfortunately the same
notation is used for comments.
This patch changes notation of selected-by-another items by introducing 2 new
representations for implied options:
{
12 matches
Mail list logo
