On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:34 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> Thanks for this, looks good to me. Just a nit below.
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2019 13:27:53 +0900 Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
> >
>
> > diff --git a/scripts/modules-check.sh b/scripts/modules-check.sh
> > new file mode 100755
>
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:46 PM Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 10:37 PM Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:45:11PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 1:29 PM Masahiro Yamada
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In the recent build test of linux
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 6:25 PM Alexander Kapshuk
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:58 AM Bernd Petrovitsch
> wrote:
> >
> > On 17/05/2019 10:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > [...]
> > > The 'xargs' '-r' flag is a GNU extension.
> > > If POSIX compliance is important here, the use of 'cat', '
On 17/05/2019 11:25, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:58 AM Bernd Petrovitsch
> wrote:
>>
>> On 17/05/2019 10:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> [...]
>>> The 'xargs' '-r' flag is a GNU extension.
>>> If POSIX compliance is important here, the use of 'cat', 'xargs' and
>>> 'basen
On 17/05/2019 10:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
[...]
> The 'xargs' '-r' flag is a GNU extension.
> If POSIX compliance is important here, the use of 'cat', 'xargs' and
> 'basename' may be substituted with that of 'sed' to initialise
> same_name_modules:
> sed 's!.*/!!' modules.order modules.builtin
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:58 AM Bernd Petrovitsch
wrote:
>
> On 17/05/2019 10:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> [...]
> > The 'xargs' '-r' flag is a GNU extension.
> > If POSIX compliance is important here, the use of 'cat', 'xargs' and
> > 'basename' may be substituted with that of 'sed' to initial
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 8:33 AM Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> In the recent build test of linux-next, Stephen saw a build error
> caused by a broken .tmp_versions/*.mod file:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/13/991
>
> drivers/net/phy/asix.ko and drivers/net/usb/asix.ko have the same
> basename, an
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 10:37 PM Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:45:11PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 1:29 PM Masahiro Yamada
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > In the recent build test of linux-next, Stephen saw a build error
> > > caused by a broken .tmp_versions/
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:45:11PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 1:29 PM Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
> >
> > In the recent build test of linux-next, Stephen saw a build error
> > caused by a broken .tmp_versions/*.mod file:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/13/991
> >
>
Hi Masahiro,
Thanks for this, looks good to me. Just a nit below.
On Fri, 17 May 2019 13:27:53 +0900 Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> diff --git a/scripts/modules-check.sh b/scripts/modules-check.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index ..c875f6eab01e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/modules-ch
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 1:29 PM Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> In the recent build test of linux-next, Stephen saw a build error
> caused by a broken .tmp_versions/*.mod file:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/13/991
>
> drivers/net/phy/asix.ko and drivers/net/usb/asix.ko have the same
> basename, an
In the recent build test of linux-next, Stephen saw a build error
caused by a broken .tmp_versions/*.mod file:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/13/991
drivers/net/phy/asix.ko and drivers/net/usb/asix.ko have the same
basename, and there is a race in generating .tmp_versions/asix.mod
Kbuild has not
12 matches
Mail list logo
