On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:35:39AM +0800, Liguo Zhang wrote:
> Send the next transfer in the i2c irq handler, and only signal
> complete() when the entire transaction has been completed.
This describes what you do. But not why. Is this an improvment of
throughput? Is there a downside of interrupt
Send the next transfer in the i2c irq handler, and only signal
complete() when the entire transaction has been completed.
Signed-off-by: Liguo Zhang
---
change in v2:
Remove the unused variable left_num in mtk_i2c_transfer().
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 221 ++--
2 matches
Mail list logo
