Re: [PATCH v2] fortify: Use WARN instead of BUG for now

2017-07-29 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Kees, [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.13-rc2 next-20170728] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Kees-Cook/fortify-Use-WARN-instead-of-BUG-for-n

Re: [PATCH v2] fortify: Use WARN instead of BUG for now

2017-07-26 Thread Kees Cook
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:52:19AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> --- a/tools/objtool/check.c >> +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c >> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int __dead_end_function(struct objtool_file >> *file, struct symbol *func, >>

Re: [PATCH v2] fortify: Use WARN instead of BUG for now

2017-07-26 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:52:19AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > --- a/tools/objtool/check.c > +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c > @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int __dead_end_function(struct objtool_file *file, > struct symbol *func, > "kvm_spurious_fault", > "__reiserfs_panic", >

[PATCH v2] fortify: Use WARN instead of BUG for now

2017-07-26 Thread Kees Cook
While CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE continues to shake out, don't unconditionally use BUG(), opting instead for WARN(). This also renames fortify_panic() to fortify_overflow() which better matches what it is being called for. Cc: Daniel Micay Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Kees Cook --- v2