On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:20:03 +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot
wrote:
> 2014-03-17 15:24 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely :
> > On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:07:37 +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Grant,
> >>
> >> Sorry for the delay, I was having nice vacations.
> >>
> >> 2014-03-08 8:37 GMT+01:00 Grant
2014-03-17 15:24 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely :
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:07:37 +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot
> wrote:
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay, I was having nice vacations.
>>
>> 2014-03-08 8:37 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely :
>> > On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:18:40 +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot
>> > wrot
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:07:37 +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Sorry for the delay, I was having nice vacations.
>
> 2014-03-08 8:37 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely :
> > On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:18:40 +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot
> > wrote:
> >> The goal of this patch is to allow drivers
Hi Grant,
Sorry for the delay, I was having nice vacations.
2014-03-08 8:37 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely :
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:18:40 +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot
> wrote:
>> The goal of this patch is to allow drivers to be probed even if at the time
>> of
>> the DT parsing some of their ressource
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 07:37:58AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> I believe we already talked about the above test. This function must
> only process devices created by of_platform_populate(). Merely checking
> the of_node pointer is not a sufficient test because there are other
> paths in the kernel
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:43:15 +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> 2014-02-21 17:22 GMT+01:00 Jean-Jacques Hiblot :
> > Hi Grygorii,
> >
> > 2014-02-21 16:37 GMT+01:00 Strashko, Grygorii :
> >> Hi Jean-Jacques,
> >>
> >> Sorry for top posting.
> >>
> >> As I know, there have been se
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:18:40 +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot
wrote:
> The goal of this patch is to allow drivers to be probed even if at the time of
> the DT parsing some of their ressources are not available yet.
Hi Jean-Jacques
[...]
> +int of_platform_device_prepare(struct platform_device *dev)
>
Hi Grant,
2014-02-21 17:22 GMT+01:00 Jean-Jacques Hiblot :
> Hi Grygorii,
>
> 2014-02-21 16:37 GMT+01:00 Strashko, Grygorii :
>> Hi Jean-Jacques,
>>
>> Sorry for top posting.
>>
>> As I know, there have been several attempts to solve the same problem
>> already:)
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/201
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:18:40PM +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
> The goal of this patch is to allow drivers to be probed even if at the time of
> the DT parsing some of their ressources are not available yet.
>
> In the current situation, the resource of a platform device are filled from
>
Hi Grygorii,
2014-02-21 16:37 GMT+01:00 Strashko, Grygorii :
> Hi Jean-Jacques,
>
> Sorry for top posting.
>
> As I know, there have been several attempts to solve the same problem
> already:)
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/216
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/22/520
> [3] https://lkml
Hi Jean-Jacques,
Sorry for top posting.
As I know, there have been several attempts to solve the same problem already:)
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/216
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/22/520
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/8/240
There are some questions related to your approach:
1) H
The goal of this patch is to allow drivers to be probed even if at the time of
the DT parsing some of their ressources are not available yet.
In the current situation, the resource of a platform device are filled from the
DT at the time the device is created (of_device_alloc()). The drawbackof thi
12 matches
Mail list logo
