On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 6:30 AM John Hubbard wrote:
>
> On 7/29/20 12:01 PM, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > First, when memory allocation for sg_list_unaligned failed, there
> > is no point of calling put_pages() as we haven't pinned any pages.
> >
> > Second, if get_user_pages_fast() failed we shoul
On 7/29/20 12:01 PM, Souptick Joarder wrote:
First, when memory allocation for sg_list_unaligned failed, there
is no point of calling put_pages() as we haven't pinned any pages.
Second, if get_user_pages_fast() failed we should unpinned num_pinned
pages, no point of checking till num_pages.
Hi
First, when memory allocation for sg_list_unaligned failed, there
is no point of calling put_pages() as we haven't pinned any pages.
Second, if get_user_pages_fast() failed we should unpinned num_pinned
pages, no point of checking till num_pages.
This will address both.
Signed-off-by: Souptick J
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:05 PM Souptick Joarder wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:22 AM Souptick Joarder wrote:
> >
> > First, when memory allocation for sg_list_unaligned failed, there
> > is no point of calling put_pages() as we haven't pinned any pages.
> >
> > Second, if get_user_pages_f
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:22 AM Souptick Joarder wrote:
>
> First, when memory allocation for sg_list_unaligned failed, there
> is no point of calling put_pages() as we haven't pinned any pages.
>
> Second, if get_user_pages_fast() failed we should unpinned num_pinned
> pages, no point of checking
First, when memory allocation for sg_list_unaligned failed, there
is no point of calling put_pages() as we haven't pinned any pages.
Second, if get_user_pages_fast() failed we should unpinned num_pinned
pages, no point of checking till num_pages.
This will address both.
Signed-off-by: Souptick J
6 matches
Mail list logo